This situation gives rise to three fundamental inquiries: What are the reasons behind advocating for a single rate? How should we outline the roadmap? And what rate would be deemed suitable and fitting?
Ever since the implementation of the Goods and Services Tax (GST) on July 1, 2017, it has demonstrated the strength of our fiscal federalism and simplified and modernized the indirect tax system. As a result, multiple indirect tax structures have been abolished, leading to the integration of the nation's economy into a single indirect tax system.
After six and a half years, the positive effects of this significant economic reform, which has created a "single national market," are evident. It has empowered small businesses, promoted transparency and clarity in tax rates, improved the ease of doing business, enhanced tax administration efficiency through the use of data and technology, expanded the tax base, and provided stability to the tax systems of the states. These direct benefits of the GST have resulted in economic and social advantages such as increased investment, job creation, and economic growth, accompanied by improved fiscal capacity for the government.
The successful implementation of the digital platform GSTN has facilitated easier transactions, compliance, and transparency in the tax system. Moreover, GST revenues have shown resilience and buoyancy, contributing to the fiscal strength of the nation. The monthly average revenue has increased from ₹89,885 crore in 2017-18 to over ₹1.66 lakh crore per month by 2023-24, and the tax base has doubled since the introduction of GST.
Currently, the primary GST slabs for regular taxpayers are 0% (for items related to food and agriculture), 5% (for items like branded cereals, edible oils, insulin, etc.), 12% (for items like butter, pasta, mobile phones, bicycles, etc.), 18% (for items like paints, plywood, etc.), and 28% (for items like cement, auto parts, tobacco, etc.). Additionally, there is a 3% tax on precious metals like gold and a 0.25% tax on diamonds and other precious stones. Cess is also imposed on specified luxury and sin goods at a rate higher than the peak 28% rate. The tax structure for services is the same as that for goods, with rates of 0% (nil-rated), 5%, 12%, 18%, and 28%.
In terms of revenue distribution, the 18% slab contributes the highest share, accounting for around 65% of net GST collection. The 28% slab contributes approximately 16% of the collection, while the 5% slab contributes about 10%. When comparing India's GST tax structure internationally, it is observed that 49 countries use a single rate, 28 countries use two rates, and only five countries use four rates for VAT/GST.
However, it is now time for three important transitions: transitioning to a single GST rate, transitioning to a broader GST regime that includes all sectors, and transitioning to a unified tax combining Central GST, State GST, and Interstate GST.
The following is the roadmap for the first transition to a single GST rate.
The Next Transformation
The implementation of a single national market under the GST regime has undeniably catalyzed economic activity. However, as we approach seven years of this transformative journey, the stage is set for more impactful reforms that could further invigorate the national economy. The foremost reform proposed is the introduction of a single GST rate. This raises three questions: Why should we have a single rate? What should the roadmap be? And what should be the appropriate rate?
Why a Single Rate?
A single rate is expected to bring several benefits. Firstly, a uniform GST rate aligns with the core objective of the GST system: to seamlessly integrate all economic activities across sectors, states, and firms, capturing a chain of value-added transactions facilitated by GST and input tax credits. Secondly, implementing a single GST rate promises complete transparency, fostering the highest levels of compliance. Thirdly, it eliminates the complexities associated with classifying goods and services, simplifying tax administration and reducing the interaction between taxpayers and assessors. Finally, a single GST rate is expected to have a positive impact on tax revenues. This would stimulate investment, create jobs, and boost economic growth. This comprehensive reform represents a significant step forward in consolidating the gains achieved through GST and propelling the Indian economy towards sustained prosperity.
What Should be the Roadmap?
Before suggesting the single rate, let us consider some relevant numbers for the fiscal year 2022-23: India's GDP is estimated to be around INR 272.41 lakh crore, and GST collections have been reported at INR 18.10 lakh crore, approximately 6.65% of the GDP. Furthermore, detected GST evasion has been estimated at INR 1.33 lakh crore, approximately 7.34% of the collected GST or about 0.48% of the GDP. Of this detected evasion, the recovery is about INR 33,000 crore, roughly 1.82% of the GST collections or about 0.12% of the GDP.
Before the implementation of GST, the commonly accepted Revenue Neutral Rate (RNRApologies, but I don't have the information you're looking for. My training data only goes up until September 2021, and I don't have access to real-time data or updates. I recommend checking official government sources or reputable financial publications for the most recent information on the GST rates in India.
Comments